By: Tim Form

Tim Form — Mon, 03 May 2010 23:31:54 +0000

Yea, lets see the statistical evidence. The let’s take a look at the judicial procedures and laws applied in the court room. In order for an unbiased approach the following questions must be answered. Do both parents start on an equal footing? Are the requirements for custody skewed in the favor of the division of work responsibilities? Why should natural parenting under marriage be allowed for two fit people and natural parenting under separation or under divorce not be allowed for two fit people? If there is a deficiency, why can’t
parenting classes make this up? Further, much of the entire
custody process is highly subjective. Based on selectivity and
bias, and comes after the fact of producing children. Selectivity of applicable laws. Bias based on gender and division of work responsibilities, among other things. Family Law should stop playing politics with children. 50% of the DNA, then 50% of the custody in ordinary child custody. Which should be the majority of cases. This is natural except when complicated by the court system. This is in the best interest of the child, the child’s parents and child’s families. It is also in line with the US Constitution.

Comments on: Child Custody: Mom Automatically Wins, Right?

By: Tim Form